On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 01:11:48PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > So I'd suggest: leave this code as is, and at some later point move > > "rework" the early machine check handler code. > > > > What do you think? > > Sounds very reasonable. Please, find my: > > Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! > Also, how such a follow-up looks to you? ... > slgfi %r14,\start > clgfi %r14,\end - \start I think using an address as an immediate value is a step in the wrong direction, since I'd like to have all code pc-relative. And as far as I can tell this new construct would only work as long as \start has an absolute address that is low enough so that it would work / fit with slgfi. Of course this will likely always be the case, but I still think this is not the way we should go.
