Re: [PATCH v10 04/19] KVM: s390: pv: refactor s390_reset_acc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 10:02 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> Refactor s390_reset_acc so that it can be reused in upcoming patches.
> 
> We don't want to hold all the locks used in a walk_page_range for too
> long, and the destroy page UVC does take some time to complete.
> Therefore we quickly gather the pages to destroy, and then destroy
> them
> without holding all the locks.
> 
> The new refactored function optionally allows to return early without
> completing if a fatal signal is pending (and return and appropriate
> error code). Two wrappers are provided to call the new function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

But see below with one naming suggestion you might want to take into
account.

[...]
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> index e8904cb9dc38..a3a1f90f6ec1 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> @@ -2676,44 +2676,81 @@ void s390_reset_cmma(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(s390_reset_cmma);
>  
> -/*
> - * make inaccessible pages accessible again
> - */
> -static int __s390_reset_acc(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
> -                           unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
> +#define DESTROY_LOOP_THRESHOLD 32

maybe GATHER_NUM_PAGE_REFS_TO_TAKE?




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux