On Thu, 12 May 2022 11:51:22 +0800 Guangguan Wang wrote: > On 2022/5/12 11:43, Tony Lu wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:11:55AM +0800, Guangguan Wang wrote: > >> Non blocking sendmsg will return -EAGAIN when any signal pending > >> and no send space left, while non blocking recvmsg return -EINTR > >> when signal pending and no data received. This may makes confused. > >> As TCP returns -EAGAIN in the conditions described above. Align the > >> behavior of smc with TCP. > >> > >> Fixes: 846e344eb722 ("net/smc: add receive timeout check") > >> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I see that you have already sent this patch to net, so this patch is a > > duplicate. There is no need to send it again to net-next. > > Ok, just ignore it. Thanks! You gotta repost just patch 2, then. Please wait until net and net-next get merged before sending (or 12h if you don't know how to figure out if that already happened ;))