Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 5/6] s390x: uv-guest: add share bit test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/2/22 11:39, Steffen Eiden wrote:
The UV facility bits shared/unshared must both be set or none.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

  s390x/uv-guest.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/s390x/uv-guest.c b/s390x/uv-guest.c
index fd2cfef1..152ad807 100644
--- a/s390x/uv-guest.c
+++ b/s390x/uv-guest.c
@@ -157,6 +157,16 @@ static void test_invalid(void)
  	report_prefix_pop();
  }
+static void test_share_bits(void)
+{
+	bool unshare = uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_REMOVE_SHARED_ACCESS);
+	bool share = uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_SET_SHARED_ACCESS);
+
+	report_prefix_push("query");
+	report(!(share ^ unshare), "share bits are identical");
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
  int main(void)
  {
  	bool has_uvc = test_facility(158);
@@ -167,6 +177,12 @@ int main(void)
  		goto done;
  	}
+ /*
+	 * Needs to be done before the guest-fence,
+	 * as the fence tests if both shared bits are present
+	 */
+	test_share_bits();
+
  	if (!uv_os_is_guest()) {
  		report_skip("Not a protected guest");
  		goto done;




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux