Re: [PATCH 2/5] lib: add bitmap_{from,to}_arr64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 01:51:13PM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> Manipulating 64-bit arrays with bitmap functions is potentially dangerous
> because on 32-bit BE machines the order of halfwords doesn't match.
> Another issue is that compiler may throw a warning about out-of-boundary
> access.
> 
> This patch adds bitmap_{from,to}_arr64 functions in addition to existing
> bitmap_{from,to}_arr32.

...

> +	bitmap_copy_clear_tail((unsigned long *) (bitmap),	\
> +			(const unsigned long *) (buf), (nbits))

Drop spaces after castings. Besides that it might be placed on a single line.

...


> +	bitmap_copy_clear_tail((unsigned long *) (buf),		\
> +			(const unsigned long *) (bitmap), (nbits))

Ditto.

...

> +void bitmap_to_arr64(u64 *buf, const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int nbits)
> +{
> +	const unsigned long *end = bitmap + BITS_TO_LONGS(nbits);
> +
> +	while (bitmap < end) {
> +		*buf = *bitmap++;
> +		if (bitmap < end)
> +			*buf |= (u64)(*bitmap++) << 32;
> +		buf++;
> +	}
>  
> +	/* Clear tail bits in last element of array beyond nbits. */
> +	if (nbits % 64)
> +		buf[-1] &= GENMASK_ULL(nbits, 0);

Hmm... if nbits is > 0 and < 64, wouldn't be this problematic, since
end == bitmap? Or did I miss something?

> +}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux