Re: [PATCH v6 16/21] vfio-pci/zdev: add open/close device hooks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/27/22 11:01 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:42:07AM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
On 4/27/22 10:04 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:08:37PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:

+static int vfio_pci_zdev_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+					unsigned long action, void *data)
+{
+	struct zpci_dev *zdev = container_of(nb, struct zpci_dev, nb);
+	int (*fn)(struct zpci_dev *zdev, struct kvm *kvm);
+	int rc = NOTIFY_OK;
+
+	if (action == VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM) {
+		if (!zdev)
+			return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+		fn = symbol_get(kvm_s390_pci_register_kvm);
+		if (!fn)
+			return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+		if (fn(zdev, (struct kvm *)data))
+			rc = NOTIFY_BAD;
+
+		symbol_put(kvm_s390_pci_register_kvm);

Is it possible this function can be in statically linked arch code?

Or, actually, is zPCI useful anyhow without kvm ie can you just have a
direct dependency here?


zPCI devices (zpci_dev) exist regardless of whether kvm is configured or
not, and you can e.g. bind the associated PCI device to vfio-pci when KVM is
not configured (or module not loaded) and get the existing vfio-pci-zdev
extensions for that device (extra VFIO_DEVICE_INFO response data).  Making a
direct dependency on KVM would remove that; this was discussed in a prior
version because this extra info is not used today outside of a KVM usecase
are not specific to kvm that need vfio-pci-zdev).

I'm a bit confused, what is the drawback of just having a direct
symbol dependency here? It means vfio loads a little extra kernel
module code, but is that really a big worry given almost all vfio
users on s390 will be using it with kvm?

It's about trying to avoid loading unnecessary code (or at least giving a way to turn it off).

Previously I did something like....

https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220204211536.321475-15-mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

And could do so again; as discussed in the thread there, I can use e.g. CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM and make vfio-pci-zdev depend on KVM in this series. You only get the vfio-pci-zdev extensions when you configure KVM.

Then if we find a usecase for a vfio-pci-zdev extension without KVM later, we can further split vfio-pci-zdev and go back to building vfio-pci-zdev when CONFIG_S390 but only build the kvm pieces (like the code above) when you specify CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM. This would eliminate this symbol_get. Sound OK?


Or is there some technical blocker? (circular dep or something?)

Jason




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux