[PATCHv2] s390/irq: utilize RCU instead of irq_lock_sparse() in show_msi_interrupt()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As demonstrated by commit 74bdf7815dfb ("genirq: Speedup show_interrupts()"),
irq_desc can be accessed safely in RCU read section.

Hence here resorting to rcu read lock to get rid of irq_lock_sparse().

Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

---
 arch/s390/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
index 3033f616e256..45393919fe61 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void show_msi_interrupt(struct seq_file *p, int irq)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int cpu;
 
-	irq_lock_sparse();
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
 	if (!desc)
 		goto out;
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void show_msi_interrupt(struct seq_file *p, int irq)
 	seq_putc(p, '\n');
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 out:
-	irq_unlock_sparse();
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.31.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux