Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the tprot test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/19/22 20:58, Thomas Huth wrote:
The tprot test currently does not have any output (unless one of
the TEST_ASSERT statement fails), so it's hard to say for a user
whether a certain new sub-test has been included in the binary or
not. Let's make this a little bit more user-friendly and include
some TAP output via the kselftests.h interface.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Some comments below.

---
  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
index c097b9db495e..baba883d7a6d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  #include <sys/mman.h>
  #include "test_util.h"
  #include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "kselftest.h"
#define PAGE_SHIFT 12
  #define PAGE_SIZE (1 << PAGE_SHIFT)
@@ -63,12 +64,12 @@ static enum permission test_protection(void *addr, uint8_t key)
  }
enum stage {
-	STAGE_END,
  	STAGE_INIT_SIMPLE,
  	TEST_SIMPLE,
  	STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE,
  	TEST_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE,
  	TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE,
+	STAGE_END			/* this must be the last entry */

...so we can use it to calculate the test number

  };
struct test {
@@ -182,7 +183,7 @@ static void guest_code(void)
  	GUEST_SYNC(perform_next_stage(&i, mapped_0));
  }

@@ -212,9 +222,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  	HOST_SYNC(vm, TEST_SIMPLE);
guest_0_page = vm_vaddr_alloc(vm, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
-	if (guest_0_page != 0)
-		print_skip("Did not allocate page at 0 for fetch protection override tests");
-	HOST_SYNC(vm, STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+	if (guest_0_page != 0) {

Maybe add:
/* Use no_tap so we don't get a PASS print */

+		HOST_SYNC_NO_TAP(vm, STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+		ksft_test_result_skip("STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE - "
+				      "Did not allocate page at 0\n");
+	} else {
+		HOST_SYNC(vm, STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+	}

Otherwise this would look weird.

  	if (guest_0_page == 0)
  		mprotect(addr_gva2hva(vm, (vm_vaddr_t)0), PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ);
  	run->s.regs.crs[0] |= CR0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE;
@@ -224,4 +238,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  	run->s.regs.crs[0] |= CR0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE;
  	run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_CRS;
  	HOST_SYNC(vm, TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+
+	ksft_finished();
  }




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux