On Mon, 2022-04-11 at 17:30 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > Thanks for tackling this! > > Having written powerpc/sprs.c in the past, I've got one question / > request: > > Could we turn this into a "real" test immediately? E.g. write a sane > value > to all control registers that are currently not in use by the k-u-t > before > migration, and then check whether the values are still in there after > migration? Maybe also some vector registers and the "guarded storage > control"? > ... or is this rather something for a later update? My plan was to first add the infrastructure for migration tests including the selftest and then later one by one add "real" tests. But if you think it is preferable, I can extend the scope and add some inital "real" tests in this series.
