On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 17:38 +0100, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > > Do we need load_guarded() in this new header? > > The load/store_gscb() functions have potential to be shared across > > tests > > but the lg doesn't need to be executed, no? > > > > We could opt to leave it in gs.c instead > > yes, probably a better idea. I'd still add the comment, though :) > > shall I just fix this up when picking? I like the suggestion by Janosch. Since I will sent the ADTL STATUS test (patch 4) in a seperate series anyways, I think it makes more sense if I include the patch there and you don't pick patches 3 and 4 from this series.
