On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 8:02 PM David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Guo Ren
> > Sent: 28 February 2022 11:52
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 2:40 PM David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: guoren@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Sent: 27 February 2022 16:28
> > > >
> > > > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Provide a single common definition for the compat_flock and
> > > > compat_flock64 structures using the same tricks as for the native
> > > > variants. Another extra define is added for the packing required on
> > > > x86.
> > > ...
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h
> > > ...
> > > > /*
> > > > - * IA32 uses 4 byte alignment for 64 bit quantities,
> > > > - * so we need to pack this structure.
> > > > + * IA32 uses 4 byte alignment for 64 bit quantities, so we need to pack the
> > > > + * compat flock64 structure.
> > > > */
> > > ...
> > > > +#define __ARCH_NEED_COMPAT_FLOCK64_PACKED
> > > >
> > > > struct compat_statfs {
> > > > int f_type;
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/compat.h b/include/linux/compat.h
> > > > index 1c758b0e0359..a0481fe6c5d5 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/compat.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/compat.h
> > > > @@ -258,6 +258,37 @@ struct compat_rlimit {
> > > > compat_ulong_t rlim_max;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef __ARCH_NEED_COMPAT_FLOCK64_PACKED
> > > > +#define __ARCH_COMPAT_FLOCK64_PACK __attribute__((packed))
> > > > +#else
> > > > +#define __ARCH_COMPAT_FLOCK64_PACK
> > > > +#endif
> > > ...
> > > > +struct compat_flock64 {
> > > > + short l_type;
> > > > + short l_whence;
> > > > + compat_loff_t l_start;
> > > > + compat_loff_t l_len;
> > > > + compat_pid_t l_pid;
> > > > +#ifdef __ARCH_COMPAT_FLOCK64_PAD
> > > > + __ARCH_COMPAT_FLOCK64_PAD
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +} __ARCH_COMPAT_FLOCK64_PACK;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Provided compat_loff_t are correctly defined with __aligned__(4)
> > See include/asm-generic/compat.h
> >
> > typedef s64 compat_loff_t;
> >
> > Only:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT
> > typedef s64 __attribute__((aligned(4))) compat_s64;
> >
> > So how do you think compat_loff_t could be defined with __aligned__(4)?
>
> compat_loff_t should be compat_s64 not s64.
>
> The same should be done for all 64bit 'compat' types.
Changing
typedef s64 compat_loff_t;
to
typedef compat_s64 compat_loff_t;
should be another patch and it affects all architectures, I don't
think we should involve it in this series.
look at kernel/power/user.c:
struct compat_resume_swap_area {
compat_loff_t offset;
u32 dev;
} __packed;
I thnk keep "typedef s64 compat_loff_t;" is a sensible choice for
COMPAT support patchset series.
>
> David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
