Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:09:50 +0100
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Some instructions are emulated by KVM. Test that KVM correctly emulates
> storage key checking for two of those instructions (STORE CPU ADDRESS,
> SET PREFIX).
> Test success and error conditions, including coverage of storage and
> fetch protection override.
> Also add test for TEST PROTECTION, even if that instruction will not be
> emulated by KVM under normal conditions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  	*entry_0_p = entry_pagebuf;
> 
> I'm wondering if we need a barrier here, or would if set_prefix_key_1
> wasn't made up of an asm volatile. But the mmu code seems to not have a
> barrier in the equivalent code, so maybe it's never needed.
> 
>  	set_prefix_key_1(0);
> 
>  lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h |  20 ++---
>  s390x/skey.c             | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> index 40626d72..e443a9cd 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> @@ -55,15 +55,17 @@ struct psw {
>  #define PSW_MASK_BA			0x0000000080000000UL
>  #define PSW_MASK_64			(PSW_MASK_BA | PSW_MASK_EA)
>  
> -#define CTL0_LOW_ADDR_PROT		(63 - 35)
> -#define CTL0_EDAT			(63 - 40)
> -#define CTL0_IEP			(63 - 43)
> -#define CTL0_AFP			(63 - 45)
> -#define CTL0_VECTOR			(63 - 46)
> -#define CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL		(63 - 49)
> -#define CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL		(63 - 50)
> -#define CTL0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR		(63 - 52)
> -#define CTL0_SERVICE_SIGNAL		(63 - 54)
> +#define CTL0_LOW_ADDR_PROT			(63 - 35)
> +#define CTL0_EDAT				(63 - 40)
> +#define CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE		(63 - 38)
> +#define CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE	(63 - 39)
> +#define CTL0_IEP				(63 - 43)
> +#define CTL0_AFP				(63 - 45)
> +#define CTL0_VECTOR				(63 - 46)
> +#define CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL			(63 - 49)
> +#define CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL			(63 - 50)
> +#define CTL0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR			(63 - 52)
> +#define CTL0_SERVICE_SIGNAL			(63 - 54)
>  #define CR0_EXTM_MASK			0x0000000000006200UL /* Combined external masks */
>  
>  #define CTL2_GUARDED_STORAGE		(63 - 59)
> diff --git a/s390x/skey.c b/s390x/skey.c
> index 58a55436..6ae2d026 100644
> --- a/s390x/skey.c
> +++ b/s390x/skey.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,10 @@
>  #include <libcflat.h>
>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>  #include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <vmalloc.h>
> +#include <mmu.h>
>  #include <asm/page.h>
> +#include <asm/pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/facility.h>
>  #include <asm/mem.h>
>  
> @@ -147,6 +150,167 @@ static void test_invalid_address(void)
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  }
>  
> +static void test_test_protection(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)pagebuf;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("TPROT");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
> +	report(tprot(addr, 0) == 0, "access key 0 -> no protection");
> +	report(tprot(addr, 1) == 0, "access key matches -> no protection");
> +	report(tprot(addr, 2) == 1, "access key mismatches, no fetch protection -> store protection");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x18, 0);
> +	report(tprot(addr, 2) == 2, "access key mismatches, fetch protection -> fetch & store protection");
> +	report_prefix_pop();

is there a reason why you don't set the storage key back to 0 once
you're done?

> +}
> +
> +static void store_cpu_address_key_1(uint16_t *out)
> +{
> +	asm volatile (
> +		"spka 0x10(0)\n\t"
> +		"stap %0\n\t"
> +		"spka 0(0)\n"
> +	     : "=Q" (*out)
> +	);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_store_cpu_address(void)
> +{
> +	uint16_t *out = (uint16_t *)pagebuf;
> +	uint16_t cpu_addr;
> +
> +	asm ("stap %0" : "=Q" (cpu_addr));
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("STORE CPU ADDRESS, zero key");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
> +	*out = 0xbeef;
> +	asm ("stap %0" : "=Q" (*out));
> +	report(*out == cpu_addr, "store occurred");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("STORE CPU ADDRESS, matching key");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
> +	*out = 0xbeef;
> +	store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
> +	report(*out == cpu_addr, "store occurred");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("STORE CPU ADDRESS, mismatching key");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);

for completeness, maybe also check that nothing gets stored?

> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("STORE CPU ADDRESS, storage-protection override, invalid key");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);

same here

> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("STORE CPU ADDRESS, storage-protection override, override key");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x90, 0);
> +	*out = 0xbeef;
> +	store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
> +	report(*out == cpu_addr, "override occurred");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> +}
> +
> +static void set_prefix_key_1(uint32_t *out)
> +{
> +	asm volatile (
> +		"spka 0x10(0)\n\t"
> +		"spx	%0\n\t"
> +		"spka 0(0)\n"
> +	     : "=Q" (*out)
> +	);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * We remapped page 0, making the lowcore inaccessible, which breaks the normal
> + * hanlder and breaks skipping the faulting instruction.
> + * Just disable dynamic address translation to make things work.
> + */
> +static void dat_fixup_pgm_int(void)
> +{
> +	uint64_t psw_mask = extract_psw_mask();
> +
> +	psw_mask &= ~PSW_MASK_DAT;
> +	load_psw_mask(psw_mask);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_set_prefix(void)
> +{
> +	uint32_t *out = (uint32_t *)pagebuf;
> +	pgd_t *root;
> +	pte_t *entry_0_p;
> +	pte_t entry_lowcore, entry_pagebuf;
> +
> +	root = (pgd_t *)(stctg(1) & PAGE_MASK);
> +	entry_0_p = get_dat_entry(root, 0, pgtable_level_pte);
> +	entry_lowcore = *entry_0_p;
> +	entry_pagebuf = __pte((virt_to_pte_phys(root, out) & PAGE_MASK));
> +
> +	asm volatile("stpx	%0" : "=Q"(*out));
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("SET PREFIX, zero key");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
> +	asm volatile("spx	%0" : "=Q" (*out));
> +	report_pass("no exception");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("SET PREFIX, matching key");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
> +	set_prefix_key_1(out);
> +	report_pass("no exception");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("SET PREFIX, mismatching key, no fetch protection");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
> +	set_prefix_key_1(out);
> +	report_pass("no exception");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("SET PREFIX, mismatching key, fetch protection");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	set_prefix_key_1(out);
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	register_pgm_cleanup_func(dat_fixup_pgm_int);
> +	ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("SET PREFIX, mismatching key, fetch protection override applies");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
> +	ipte(0, &pte_val(*entry_0_p));
> +	*entry_0_p = entry_pagebuf;
> +	set_prefix_key_1(0);
> +	ipte(0, &pte_val(*entry_0_p));
> +	*entry_0_p = entry_lowcore;
> +	report_pass("no exception");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("SET PREFIX, mismatching key, fetch protection override does not apply");
> +	set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	ipte(0, &pte_val(*entry_0_p));
> +	*entry_0_p = entry_pagebuf;
> +	set_prefix_key_1((uint32_t *)2048);
> +	ipte(0, &pte_val(*entry_0_p));
> +	*entry_0_p = entry_lowcore;
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> +	register_pgm_cleanup_func(NULL);
> +}
> +
>  int main(void)
>  {
>  	report_prefix_push("skey");
> @@ -159,6 +323,11 @@ int main(void)
>  	test_set();
>  	test_set_mb();
>  	test_chg();
> +	test_test_protection();
> +	test_store_cpu_address();
> +
> +	setup_vm();
> +	test_set_prefix();
>  done:
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  	return report_summary();
> 
> base-commit: 257c962f3d1b2d0534af59de4ad18764d734903a




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux