On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 14:54:56 +0000
Steffen Eiden <seiden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Adds several tests to verify correct error paths of attestation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in general looks good but I have several nits regarding the strings
used to report the tests
> ---
> lib/s390x/asm/uv.h | 5 +-
> s390x/uv-guest.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> index c330c0f8..e5f7aa72 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> @@ -108,7 +108,10 @@ struct uv_cb_qui {
> u8 reserved88[158 - 136]; /* 0x0088 */
> uint16_t max_guest_cpus; /* 0x009e */
> u64 uv_feature_indications; /* 0x00a0 */
> - u8 reserveda8[200 - 168]; /* 0x00a8 */
> + uint8_t reserveda8[224 - 168]; /* 0x00a8 */
> + uint64_t supp_att_hdr_ver; /* 0x00e0 */
> + uint64_t supp_paf; /* 0x00e8 */
> + uint8_t reservedf0[256 - 240]; /* 0x00f0 */
> } __attribute__((packed)) __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> struct uv_cb_cgc {
> diff --git a/s390x/uv-guest.c b/s390x/uv-guest.c
> index 77057bd2..77edbba2 100644
> --- a/s390x/uv-guest.c
> +++ b/s390x/uv-guest.c
> @@ -2,10 +2,11 @@
> /*
> * Guest Ultravisor Call tests
> *
> - * Copyright (c) 2020 IBM Corp
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2020, 2022
> *
> * Authors:
> * Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + * Steffen Eiden <seiden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> */
>
> #include <libcflat.h>
> @@ -53,6 +54,15 @@ static void test_priv(void)
> check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
> report_prefix_pop();
>
> + report_prefix_push("attest");
> + uvcb.cmd = UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION;
> + uvcb.len = sizeof(struct uv_cb_attest);
> + expect_pgm_int();
> + enter_pstate();
> + uv_call_once(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> report_prefix_pop();
> }
>
> @@ -111,7 +121,187 @@ static void test_sharing(void)
> cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> report(cc == 0 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "unshare");
> report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +#define ARCB_VERSION_NONE 0
> +#define ARCB_VERSION_1 0x0100
> +#define ARCB_MEAS_NONE 0
> +#define ARCB_MEAS_HMAC_SHA512 1
> +#define MEASUREMENT_SIZE_HMAC_SHA512 64
> +#define PAF_PHKH_ATT (1ULL << 61)
> +#define ADDITIONAL_SIZE_PAF_PHKH_ATT 32
> +/* arcb with one key slot and no nonce */
> +struct uv_arcb_v1 {
> + uint64_t reserved0; /* 0x0000 */
> + uint32_t req_ver; /* 0x0008 */
> + uint32_t req_len; /* 0x000c */
> + uint8_t iv[12]; /* 0x0010 */
> + uint32_t reserved1c; /* 0x001c */
> + uint8_t reserved20[7]; /* 0x0020 */
> + uint8_t nks; /* 0x0027 */
> + uint32_t reserved28; /* 0x0028 */
> + uint32_t sea; /* 0x002c */
> + uint64_t plaint_att_flags; /* 0x0030 */
> + uint32_t meas_alg_id; /* 0x0038 */
> + uint32_t reserved3c; /* 0x003c */
> + uint8_t cpk[160]; /* 0x0040 */
> + uint8_t key_slot[80]; /* 0x00e0 */
> + uint8_t meas_key[64]; /* 0x0130 */
> + uint8_t tag[16]; /* 0x0170 */
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +struct attest_request_v1 {
> + struct uv_arcb_v1 arcb;
> + uint8_t measurement[MEASUREMENT_SIZE_HMAC_SHA512];
> + uint8_t additional[ADDITIONAL_SIZE_PAF_PHKH_ATT];
> +};
> +
> +static void test_attest_v1(u64 supported_paf)
> +{
> + struct uv_cb_attest uvcb = {
> + .header.cmd = UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION,
> + .header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
> + };
> + struct attest_request_v1 *attest_req = (void *)page;
> + struct uv_arcb_v1 *arcb = &attest_req->arcb;
> + int cc;
> +
> + memset((void *)page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + /*
> + * Create a minimal arcb/uvcb such that FW has everything to start
> + * unsealing the request. However, this unsealing will fail as the
> + * kvm-unit-test framework provides no cryptography functions that
> + * would be needed to seal such requests.
> + */
> + arcb->req_ver = ARCB_VERSION_1;
> + arcb->req_len = sizeof(*arcb);
> + arcb->nks = 1;
> + arcb->sea = sizeof(arcb->meas_key);
> + arcb->plaint_att_flags = PAF_PHKH_ATT;
> + arcb->meas_alg_id = ARCB_MEAS_HMAC_SHA512;
> + uvcb.arcb_addr = (uint64_t)&attest_req->arcb;
> + uvcb.measurement_address = (uint64_t)attest_req->measurement;
> + uvcb.measurement_length = sizeof(attest_req->measurement);
> + uvcb.add_data_address = (uint64_t)attest_req->additional;
> + uvcb.add_data_length = sizeof(attest_req->additional);
> +
> + uvcb.continuation_token = 0xff;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0101, "invalid continuation token");
> + uvcb.continuation_token = 0;
> +
> + uvcb.user_data_length = sizeof(uvcb.user_data) + 1;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0102, "invalid user data size");
> + uvcb.user_data_length = 0;
> +
> + uvcb.arcb_addr = get_ram_size() + PAGE_SIZE;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0103, "invalid address arcb");
> + uvcb.arcb_addr = page;
> +
> + /* 0104 - 0105 need an unseal-able request */
> +
> + arcb->req_ver = ARCB_VERSION_NONE;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0106, "unsupported version");
> + arcb->req_ver = ARCB_VERSION_1;
> +
> + arcb->req_len += 1;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0107, "invalid arcb size 1");
I would like a more descriptive string for the report message.
something like "arcb too big"
> + arcb->req_len -= 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * The arcb needs to grow as well if number of key slots (nks)
> + * is increased. However, this is not the case and there is no explicit
> + * 'too many/less nks for that arcb size' error code -> expect 0x0107
> + */
> + arcb->nks = 2;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0107, "invalid arcb size 2");
and here maybe something like "arcb too small for nks" or "too many nks
for arcb"
> + arcb->nks = 1;
> +
> + arcb->nks = 0;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0108, "invalid num key slots");
> + arcb->nks = 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Possible valid size (when using nonce).
> + * However, req_len too small to host a nonce
> + */
> + arcb->sea = 80;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0109, "invalid encrypted size 1");
"encrypted size too big" (if I understand correctly)
> + arcb->sea = 17;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0109, "invalid encrypted size 2");
"encrypted size too small" (if I understand correctly)
> + arcb->sea = 64;
> +
> + arcb->plaint_att_flags = supported_paf ^ GENMASK_ULL(63, 0);
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010a, "invalid flag");
> + arcb->plaint_att_flags = PAF_PHKH_ATT;
> +
> + arcb->meas_alg_id = ARCB_MEAS_NONE;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010b, "invalid measurement algorithm");
> + arcb->meas_alg_id = ARCB_MEAS_HMAC_SHA512;
>
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010c, "unable unseal");
> +
> + uvcb.measurement_length = 0;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010d, "invalid measurement size");
> + uvcb.measurement_length = sizeof(attest_req->measurement);
> +
> + uvcb.add_data_length = 0;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010e, "invalid additional size");
> + uvcb.add_data_length = sizeof(attest_req->additional);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_attest(void)
> +{
> + struct uv_cb_attest uvcb = {
> + .header.cmd = UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION,
> + .header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
> + };
> + const struct uv_cb_qui *uvcb_qui = uv_get_query_data();
> + int cc;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("attest");
> +
> + if (!uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION)) {
> + report_skip("Attestation not supported.");
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + /* Verify that the UV supports at least one header version */
> + report(uvcb_qui->supp_att_hdr_ver, "has hdr support");
> +
> + memset((void *)page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + uvcb.header.len -= 1;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_INV_LEN, "invalid uvcb size 1");
"uvcb too small"
> + uvcb.header.len += 1;
> +
> + uvcb.header.len += 1;
> + cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
> + report(cc && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_INV_LEN, "invalid uvcb size 2");
"uvcb too large"
> + uvcb.header.len -= 1;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("v1");
> + if (test_bit_inv(0, &uvcb_qui->supp_att_hdr_ver))
> + test_attest_v1(uvcb_qui->supp_paf);
> + else
> + report_skip("Attestation version 1 not supported");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +done:
> report_prefix_pop();
> }
>
> @@ -193,6 +383,7 @@ int main(void)
> test_invalid();
> test_query();
> test_sharing();
> + test_attest();
> free_page((void *)page);
> done:
> report_prefix_pop();
