On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:24 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:19:29PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:21:10PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:17:40AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:47:43AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > > > > > > These all look trivially correct to me. Only two didn't have the end of > > > > the struct visible in the patch, and checking those showed them to be > > > > trailing members as well, so: > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > I'll add this to my -next tree. > > > > I would like to ask you to send mlx5 patch separately to netdev. We are working > > to delete that file completely and prefer to avoid from unnecessary merge conflicts. > > Oh OK. Sure thing; I will do so. Can you also send the ACPI patch separately, please? We would like to route it through the upstream ACPICA code base.
