Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net/smc: Remove corked dealyed work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/30/22 19:02, Tony Lu wrote:
Based on the manual of TCP_CORK [1] and MSG_MORE [2], these two options
have the same effect. Applications can set these options and informs the
kernel to pend the data, and send them out only when the socket or
syscall does not specify this flag. In other words, there's no need to
send data out by a delayed work, which will queue a lot of work.

This removes corked delayed work with SMC_TX_CORK_DELAY (250ms), and the
applications control how/when to send them out. It improves the
performance for sendfile and throughput, and remove unnecessary race of
lock_sock(). This also unlocks the limitation of sndbuf, and try to fill
it up before sending.

[1] https://linux.die.net/man/7/tcp
[2] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/send.2.html

Signed-off-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/smc/smc_tx.c | 15 ++++++---------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
index 7b0b6e24582f..9cec62cae7cb 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
  #include "smc_tracepoint.h"
#define SMC_TX_WORK_DELAY 0
-#define SMC_TX_CORK_DELAY	(HZ >> 2)	/* 250 ms */
/***************************** sndbuf producer *******************************/ @@ -237,15 +236,13 @@ int smc_tx_sendmsg(struct smc_sock *smc, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
  		if ((msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB) && !send_remaining)
  			conn->urg_tx_pend = true;
  		if ((msg->msg_flags & MSG_MORE || smc_tx_is_corked(smc)) &&
-		    (atomic_read(&conn->sndbuf_space) >
-						(conn->sndbuf_desc->len >> 1)))
-			/* for a corked socket defer the RDMA writes if there
-			 * is still sufficient sndbuf_space available
+		    (atomic_read(&conn->sndbuf_space)))
+			/* for a corked socket defer the RDMA writes if
+			 * sndbuf_space is still available. The applications
+			 * should known how/when to uncork it.
  			 */
-			queue_delayed_work(conn->lgr->tx_wq, &conn->tx_work,
-					   SMC_TX_CORK_DELAY);
-		else
-			smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(conn);
+			continue;

In case we just corked the final bytes in this call, wouldn't this 'continue' prevent us from accounting the Bytes that we just staged to be sent out later in the trace_smc_tx_sendmsg() call below?

+		smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(conn);
trace_smc_tx_sendmsg(smc, copylen);





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux