On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:28:19 +0100
Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 1/14/22 12:18, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:02:41 +0000
> > Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> This patch will likely (in parts) be replaced by Pierre's patch from
> >> his topology test series.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > although I think there is some room for improvement, but nothing too
> > serious, I'll probably fix it myself later
>
> I think I should add this to clean up the checks in the following patches:
>
> bool vm_is_qemu(void)
> {
> return vm_is_kvm() || vm_is_tcg();
> }
>
> That of course also isn't a 100% correct, we could have KVM + non-QEMU
> but I'll cross that bridge when I get there.
>
> And as I already mentioned in Pierre's patch, the STSI values are a bit
> of a mystery to me since AFAIK we store KVM/Linux even if we run under TCG.
I was actually thinking of a generic detection function that will call
STSI only once and set all the necessary flags.
then the various vm_is_* functions can become something like this:
bool vm_is_${TYPE}()
{
if (vm_type == VM_TYPE_NOT_INITIALIZED)
do_vm_detection();
return vm_type == VM_${TYPE};
}
and then have all the magic hidden in the one do_vm_detection, which
will call STSI once and try to find out what we are running on.
