On 2022/1/6 6:00 pm, Karsten Graul wrote:
Looks like I missed a prereq patch here, but wo'nt conn->lgr be set to NULL after smc_conn_free() called smc_lgr_unregister_conn()?
Right... I should hold a local copy of lgr in smc_conn_abort(). My another RFC patch removes 'conn->lgr = NULL' from smc_lgr_unregister_conn(), so I make a mistake here... I will fix this. Thank you. Wen Gu
