Re: [PATCH 16/32] KVM: s390: expose the guest zPCI interpretation facility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 07.12.21 um 21:57 schrieb Matthew Rosato:
This facility will be used to enable interpretive execution of zPCI
instructions.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++++
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index c8fe9b7c2395..09991d05c871 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -2751,6 +2751,10 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
  		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 147);
  		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_list, 147);
  	}
+	if (sclp.has_zpci_interp && test_facility(69)) {
+		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 69);
+		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_list, 69);
+	}


Do we need the setting of these stfle bits somewhere? I think QEMU sets them as well for the guest.
We only need this when the kernel probes for this (test_kvm_facility) But then the question is, shouldnt
we then simply check for sclp bits in those places?
See also patch 19. We need to build it in a way that allows VSIE support later on.

if (css_general_characteristics.aiv && test_facility(65))
  		set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 65);




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux