Re: [PATCH 14/32] KVM: s390: pci: do initial setup for AEN interpretation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 09.12.21 um 21:20 schrieb Matthew Rosato:
On 12/9/21 2:54 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am 07.12.21 um 21:57 schrieb Matthew Rosato:
Initial setup for Adapter Event Notification Interpretation for zPCI
passthrough devices.  Specifically, allocate a structure for forwarding of
adapter events and pass the address of this structure to firmware.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h |  12 ++++
  arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c        |  17 +++++
  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |   3 +
  arch/s390/kvm/pci.c              | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/s390/kvm/pci.h              |  42 ++++++++++++
  5 files changed, 187 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 arch/s390/kvm/pci.h

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h
index 5331082fa516..e5f57cfe1d45 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct zpci_fib {
  /* Set Interruption Controls Operation Controls  */
  #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_ALL        0
  #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_SINGLE        1
+#define    SIC_SET_AENI_CONTROLS        2
  #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_DIRECT        4
  #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_D_ALL        16
  #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_D_SINGLE        17
@@ -127,9 +128,20 @@ struct zpci_cdiib {
      u64 : 64;
  } __packed __aligned(8);
+/* adapter interruption parameters block */
+struct zpci_aipb {
+    u64 faisb;
+    u64 gait;
+    u16 : 13;
+    u16 afi : 3;
+    u32 : 32;
+    u16 faal;
+} __packed __aligned(8);
+
  union zpci_sic_iib {
      struct zpci_diib diib;
      struct zpci_cdiib cdiib;
+    struct zpci_aipb aipb;
  };
  DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(have_mio);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index f9b872e358c6..4efe0e95a40f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
  #include "kvm-s390.h"
  #include "gaccess.h"
  #include "trace-s390.h"
+#include "pci.h"
  #define PFAULT_INIT 0x0600
  #define PFAULT_DONE 0x0680
@@ -3276,8 +3277,16 @@ static struct airq_struct gib_alert_irq = {
  void kvm_s390_gib_destroy(void)
  {
+    struct zpci_aift *aift;
+
      if (!gib)
          return;
+    aift = kvm_s390_pci_get_aift();
+    if (aift) {
+        mutex_lock(&aift->lock)

aift is a static variable and later patches seem to access that directly without the wrapper.
Can we get rid of kvm_s390_pci_get_aift?

kvm/interrupt.c must also access it when handling AEN forwarding (next patch)

So maybe just make it non-static and declare it in the header file?
[...]

Can we maybe use designated initializer for the static definition of aift, e.g. something
like
static struct zpci_aift aift = {
     .gait_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(aift.gait_lock),
     .lock    = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(aift.lock),
}
and get rid of the init function? >

Maybe -- I can certainly do the above, but I do add a call to zpci_get_mdd() in the init function (patch 23), so if I want to in patch 23 instead add .mdd = zpci_get_mdd() to this designated initializer I'd have to re-work zpci_get_mdd (patch 12) to return the mdd rather than the CLP LIST PCI return code.  We want at least a warning if we're setting a 0 for mdd because the CLP failed for some bizarre reason.

I guess one option would be to move the WARN_ON into the zpci_get_mdd() function itself and then now we can do

So maybe leave this as is.

u32 zpci_get_mdd(void);

Niklas, what do you think?




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux