Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] s390/kexec_file: print some more error messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Philipp,

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:57:48PM +0100, Philipp Rudo wrote:
> Be kind and give some more information on what went wrong.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxx>
...
> @@ -304,15 +306,22 @@ int arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add(struct purgatory_info *pi,
>  		sym = (void *)pi->ehdr + symtab->sh_offset;
>  		sym += ELF64_R_SYM(relas[i].r_info);
>  
> -		if (sym->st_shndx == SHN_UNDEF)
> +		if (sym->st_shndx == SHN_UNDEF) {
> +			pr_err("Undefined symbol\n");
>  			return -ENOEXEC;
> +		}
>  
> -		if (sym->st_shndx == SHN_COMMON)
> +		if (sym->st_shndx == SHN_COMMON) {
> +			pr_err("symbol in common section\n");
>  			return -ENOEXEC;
> +		}
>  
>  		if (sym->st_shndx >= pi->ehdr->e_shnum &&
> -		    sym->st_shndx != SHN_ABS)
> +		    sym->st_shndx != SHN_ABS) {
> +			pr_err("Invalid section %d for symbol\n",
> +			       sym->st_shndx);
>  			return -ENOEXEC;

So, if you add the additional error messages here, then I'd really
like to see also the name of the symbol which is causing
problems. Just like it is done on x86.
Sorry for nitpicking :)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux