Re: [PATCH 29/29] fsdax: don't require CONFIG_BLOCK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:33:09AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The file system DAX code now does not require the block code.  So allow
> building a kernel with fuse DAX but not block layer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> ---
>  fs/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> index 6d608330a096e..7a2b11c0b8036 100644
> --- a/fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ source "fs/nilfs2/Kconfig"
>  source "fs/f2fs/Kconfig"
>  source "fs/zonefs/Kconfig"
>  
> +endif # BLOCK
> +
>  config FS_DAX
>  	bool "File system based Direct Access (DAX) support"
>  	depends on MMU
> @@ -89,8 +91,6 @@ config FS_DAX_PMD
>  config FS_DAX_LIMITED
>  	bool
>  
> -endif # BLOCK
> -
>  # Posix ACL utility routines
>  #
>  # Note: Posix ACLs can be implemented without these helpers.  Never use
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux