Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: RISC-V: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:05 PM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It doesn't make sense to return the recommended maximum number of
> vCPUs which exceeds the maximum possible number of vCPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me.

For KVM RISC-V:
Acked-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Anup

> ---
>  arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c
> index 26399df15b63..fb18af34a4b5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>                 r = 1;
>                 break;
>         case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
> -               r = num_online_cpus();
> +               r = min_t(unsigned int, num_online_cpus(), KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
>                 break;
>         case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
>                 r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> --
> 2.33.1
>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux