On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 17:16 +0100, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 11/10/21 21:33, Eric Farman wrote:
...snip...
> > + case KVM_S390_VCPU_SET_SIGP_BUSY: {
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.user_sigp_busy)
> > + return -EFAULT;
>
> Huh?
> This should be EINVAL, no?
Of course; my mistake.
>
> > +
> > + rc = kvm_s390_vcpu_set_sigp_busy(vcpu);
> > + VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 3, "SIGP: CPU %x set busy rc %x",
> > vcpu->vcpu_id, rc);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > + case KVM_S390_VCPU_RESET_SIGP_BUSY: {
> > + if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.user_sigp_busy)
> > + return -EFAULT;
>
> Same
>
>
