> We think ethtool_ringparam_ext is more easy to understand it is extension of
> struct ethtool_ringparam. However, we don't mind to keep the same way and modify
> to the name kernel_ethtool_ringparam if everyone agrees.
>
> Does anyone have other opinions?
What has been done most in the past? We should one way to do this, and
consistently use it everywhere in the network stack.
Andrew
