Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/2] s390x: Add specification exception interception test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/5/21 3:09 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Tue,  5 Oct 2021 11:11:53 +0200
> Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Check that specification exceptions cause intercepts when
>> specification exception interpretation is off.
>> Check that specification exceptions caused by program new PSWs
>> cause interceptions.
>> We cannot assert that non program new PSW specification exceptions
>> are interpreted because whether interpretation occurs or not is
>> configuration dependent.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  s390x/Makefile             |  2 +
>>  lib/s390x/sie.h            |  1 +
>>  s390x/snippets/c/spec_ex.c | 20 +++++++++
>>  s390x/spec_ex-sie.c        | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  s390x/unittests.cfg        |  3 ++
>>  5 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 s390x/snippets/c/spec_ex.c
>>  create mode 100644 s390x/spec_ex-sie.c
>>
>> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
>> index ef8041a..7198882 100644
>> --- a/s390x/Makefile
>> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg.elf
>>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/uv-host.elf
>>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/edat.elf
>>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf
>> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/spec_ex-sie.elf
>>  
>>  tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
>>  ifneq ($(HOST_KEY_DOCUMENT),)
>> @@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ snippet_asmlib = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/cstart.o
>>  # perquisites (=guests) for the snippet hosts.
>>  # $(TEST_DIR)/<snippet-host>.elf: snippets = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/<c/asm>/<snippet>.gbin
>>  $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf: snippets = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/mvpg-snippet.gbin
>> +$(TEST_DIR)/spec_ex-sie.elf: snippets = $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/spec_ex.gbin
>>  
>>  $(SNIPPET_DIR)/asm/%.gbin: $(SNIPPET_DIR)/asm/%.o $(FLATLIBS)
>>  	$(OBJCOPY) -O binary $(patsubst %.gbin,%.o,$@) $@
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sie.h b/lib/s390x/sie.h
>> index ca514ef..7ef7251 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/sie.h
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/sie.h
>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
>>  	uint8_t		fpf;			/* 0x0060 */
>>  #define ECB_GS		0x40
>>  #define ECB_TE		0x10
>> +#define ECB_SPECI	0x08
>>  #define ECB_SRSI	0x04
>>  #define ECB_HOSTPROTINT	0x02
>>  	uint8_t		ecb;			/* 0x0061 */
>> diff --git a/s390x/snippets/c/spec_ex.c b/s390x/snippets/c/spec_ex.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..bdba4f4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/s390x/snippets/c/spec_ex.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * © Copyright IBM Corp. 2021
>> + *
>> + * Snippet used by specification exception interception test.
>> + */
>> +#include <stdint.h>
>> +#include <asm/arch_def.h>
>> +
>> +__attribute__((section(".text"))) int main(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct lowcore *lowcore = (struct lowcore *) 0;
>> +	uint64_t bad_psw = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* PSW bit 12 has no name or meaning and must be 0 */
>> +	lowcore->pgm_new_psw.mask = 1UL << (63 - 12);
> 
> you can use the BIT or BIT_ULL macro
> 
>> +	lowcore->pgm_new_psw.addr = 0xdeadbeee;
> 
> if the system is broken, it might actually jump at that address; in
> that case, will the test fail?

Broken how? If interpretation is overzealous the test might hang.

[...]



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux