Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/2] s390x: Remove assert from arch_def.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/5/21 11:11, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
Do not use asserts in arch_def.h so it can be included by snippets.
The caller in stsi.c does not need to be adjusted, returning -1 causes
the test to fail.

Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

A few days ago I had a minute to investigate what needed to be added to be able to link the libcflat. Fortunately it wasn't a lot and I'll try to post it this week so this patch can hopefully be dropped.

---
  lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 5 +++--
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
index 302ef1f..4167e2b 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static inline int stsi(void *addr, int fc, int sel1, int sel2)
  	return cc;
  }
-static inline unsigned long stsi_get_fc(void)
+static inline int stsi_get_fc(void)
  {
  	register unsigned long r0 asm("0") = 0;
  	register unsigned long r1 asm("1") = 0;
@@ -346,7 +346,8 @@ static inline unsigned long stsi_get_fc(void)
  		     : "+d" (r0), [cc] "=d" (cc)
  		     : "d" (r1)
  		     : "cc", "memory");
-	assert(!cc);
+	if (cc != 0)
+		return -1;
  	return r0 >> 28;
  }




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux