On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 08:40:43AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > On 9/21/21 4:58 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 04:43:59PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > > On 9/21/21 4:34 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:27:17PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:20:59AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > > > I still believe calling cc_platform_has() from __startup_64() is totally > > > > > > broken as it lacks proper wrapping while accessing global variables. > > > > > > > > > > Well, one of the issues on the AMD side was using boot_cpu_data too > > > > > early and the Intel side uses it too. Can you replace those checks with > > > > > is_tdx_guest() or whatever was the helper's name which would check > > > > > whether the the kernel is running as a TDX guest, and see if that helps? > > > > > > > > There's no need in Intel check this early. Only AMD need it. Maybe just > > > > opencode them? > > > > > > Any way you can put a gzipped/bzipped copy of your vmlinux file somewhere I > > > can grab it from and take a look at it? > > > > You can find broken vmlinux and bzImage here: > > > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Fdrive%2Ffolders%2F1n74vUQHOGebnF70Im32qLFY8iS3wvjIs%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=04%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C1c7adf380cbe4c1a6bb708d97d4af6ff%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637678583935705530%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=gA30x%2Bfu97tUx0p2UqI8HgjiL8bxDbK1GqgJBbUrUE4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > Let me know when I can remove it. > > Looking at everything, it is all RIP relative addressing, so those > accesses should be fine. Not fine, but waiting to blowup with random build environment change. > Your image has the intel_cc_platform_has() > function, does it work if you remove that call? Because I think it may be > the early call into that function which looks like it has instrumentation > that uses %gs in __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc and %gs is not setup properly > yet. And since boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor will likely be zero this early it > will match X86_VENDOR_INTEL and call into that function. Right removing call to intel_cc_platform_has() or moving it to cc_platform.c fixes the issue. -- Kirill A. Shutemov
