On Tue, 2021-09-14 at 01:27 +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> The general convention for pcibios_* hooks is that they're named after
> the corresponding pci_* function they provide a hook for. The exception
> is pcibios_add_device() which provides a hook for pci_device_add(). This
> has been irritating me for years so rename it.
>
> Also, remove the export of the microblaze version. The only caller
> must be compiled as a built-in so there's no reason for the export.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c | 3 +--
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c | 2 +-
> arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/pci/common.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/pci.h | 2 +-
> 9 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>
.. snip ..
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> index e7e6788d75a8..ded3321b7208 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static void zpci_cleanup_bus_resources(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
> zdev->has_resources = 0;
> }
>
> -int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +int pcibios_device_add(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(pdev);
> struct resource *res;
>
.. snip ..
>
I agree with your assesment this is indeed confusing. Interestingly
pcibios_release_device() also doesn't follow the convention exactly as
it is called from pci_release_dev() but at least that isn't very
confusing.
So for the arch/s390/pci bit:
Acked-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
