Re: [PATCH 9/9] s390/block/xpram: add error handling support for add_disk()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 10:41:05AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> We never checked for errors on add_disk() as this function
> returned void. Now that this is fixed, use the shiny new
> error handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/block/xpram.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c b/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c
> index ce98fab4d43c..ed3904b6a9c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c
> @@ -371,7 +371,9 @@ static int __init xpram_setup_blkdev(void)
>  		disk->private_data = &xpram_devices[i];
>  		sprintf(disk->disk_name, "slram%d", i);
>  		set_capacity(disk, xpram_sizes[i] << 1);
> -		add_disk(disk);
> +		rc = add_disk(disk);
> +		if (rc)
> +			goto out;

Hmm, this is a more or less dead device driver, and I'm wondering if
we shouldn't remove it instead. But anyway, your patch is not correct:

- del_gendisk for all registered disks has to be called
- unregister_blkdev(XPRAM_MAJOR, XPRAM_NAME) is missing as well

That would be more or or less xpram_exit with parameter.

You can send a new patch or I can provide a proper one, whatever you
prefer.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux