Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/3] s390x: uv-host: Explain why we set up the home space and remove the space change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/08/2021 13.39, Janosch Frank wrote:
UV home addresses don't require us to be in home space but we need to
have it set up so hw/fw can use the home asce to translate home
virtual addresses.

Hence we add a comment why we're setting up the home asce and remove
the address space since it's unneeded.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  s390x/uv-host.c | 11 ++++++++---
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/s390x/uv-host.c b/s390x/uv-host.c
index 426a67f6..28035707 100644
--- a/s390x/uv-host.c
+++ b/s390x/uv-host.c
@@ -444,13 +444,18 @@ static void test_clear(void)
static void setup_vmem(void)
  {
-	uint64_t asce, mask;
+	uint64_t asce;
setup_mmu(get_max_ram_size(), NULL);
+	/*
+	 * setup_mmu() will enable DAT and set the primary address
+	 * space but we need to have a valid home space since UV calls
+	 * take home space virtual addresses.
+	 *
+	 * Hence we just copy the primary asce into the home space.
+	 */
  	asce = stctg(1);
  	lctlg(13, asce);
-	mask = extract_psw_mask() | 0x0000C00000000000UL;
-	load_psw_mask(mask);
  }
int main(void)


Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux