On 8/19/21 1:58 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:54:33AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Nope. The only requests for merges through my tree that I'm aware of
were [1] and what I understand was the evolution of that here now [2].
Maybe you're thinking of [3], which I do see in mainline where this was
2/2 in that series but afaict only patch 1/2 was committed. I guess
that explains why there was no respin based on comments for this patch.
Thanks,
Tony,
If you take Alex's tree from here:
https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio/commits/next
I navigated to this URL and clicked the green 'Code'
button. I was given the option to download the zip file or
use git to checkout the code at the URL displayed
'https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio.git'. I cloned the
repo at that URL and the code was definitely not in any
way similar to my code base. In particular, the
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h file did not have any
of the crypto structures.
I then downloaded the zip file and expanded it. The code
looked legitimate, but this was not a git repository, so I
had no way to cherry-pick my patches nor format patches
to post to this mailing list.
Next, I tried cloning from
'https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio-next.git',
but I was prompted for uid/pw.
So, the question is, how to I get the linux-vfio-next repo upon which I
can rebase my patches? I apologize for my ignorance.
And rebase + repost exactly the patches you need applied it would be
helpful.
Jason