Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nsm_use_hostnames on big endian machines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for your review, Bruce. I'll watch for the additional Ack.

> On Aug 3, 2021, at 10:08 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Looks good to me.  Could Chuck take it with nfsd stuff if somebody could
> ACK the sysctl part?
> 
> --b.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:59:35PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> There is an endianess problem with /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nsm_use_hostnames
>> (which can e.g. be seen on an s390x host) :
>> 
>> # modprobe lockd nsm_use_hostnames=1
>> # cat /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nsm_use_hostnames
>> 16777216
>> 
>> The nsm_use_hostnames variable is declared as "bool" which is required
>> for the correct type for the module parameter. However, this does not
>> work correctly with the entry in the /proc filesystem since this
>> currently requires "int".
>> 
>> Jia He already provided patches for this problem a couple of years ago,
>> but apparently they felt through the cracks and never got merged. So
>> here's a rebased version to finally fix this issue.
>> 
>> Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764075
>> 
>> Jia He (2):
>>  sysctl: introduce new proc handler proc_dobool
>>  lockd: change the proc_handler for nsm_use_hostnames
>> 
>> fs/lockd/svc.c         |  2 +-
>> include/linux/sysctl.h |  2 ++
>> kernel/sysctl.c        | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> -- 
>> 2.27.0

--
Chuck Lever







[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux