Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] s390x: Add SPDX and header comments for s390x/* and lib/s390x/*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/07/2021 13.41, Janosch Frank wrote:
On 7/28/21 1:36 PM, Janosch Frank wrote:
On 7/28/21 12:36 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 28/07/2021 12.32, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:13:26 +0000
Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Seems like I missed adding them.

The s390x/sieve.c one is a bit of a head scratcher since it came with
the first commit but I assume it's lpgl2-only since that's what the
COPYRIGHT file said then.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   lib/s390x/uv.c   |  9 +++++++++
   s390x/mvpg-sie.c |  9 +++++++++
   s390x/sie.c      | 10 ++++++++++
   x86/sieve.c      |  5 +++++
   4 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
[...]
diff --git a/x86/sieve.c b/x86/sieve.c
index 8150f2d9..b89d5f80 100644
--- a/x86/sieve.c
+++ b/x86/sieve.c
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.0-only */

do you really need to fix something in the x86 directory? (even though
it is also used on other archs)

I just realized that s390x/sieve.c is just a symlink, not a copy of the file :-)

You're not the only one...


maybe you can split out this as a separate patch, so s390x stuff is
more self contained, and others can then discuss the sieve.c patch
separately if needed?

That might make sense, indeed.

Yup will do

On second thought I'm just gonna drop that hunk since x86 doesn't really
have SPDX or header comments for most of their files anyway.

That's fine, too. We can still add them there later.

 Thomas




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux