On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 08:09:41PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:54:40PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > I'm still not happy with how this is likely to break users and even > > downstreams when upgrading to a Kconfig with this change. > > I've never heard of Kconfig as stable ABI. Christoph/Arnd, have you > heard of any cases where we want to keep it stable? Of course not, otherwise we won't be able to do ANY cleanup in the kernel. > > As far as I know we should change kconfig to keep it working properly, > eg by having correct menu structure and sane kconfig names. Everyone who upgrades through source code and needs rebuild kernel should be proficient enough to enable/disable kernel config. Thanks
