On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 19:56:42 +0200 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14.07.21 15:25, Tony Krowiak wrote: > > > >> This patch shows it works as a rwsem - look at what had to be changed > >> to make it so and you will find some clue to where the problems are in > >> kvm_busy version. > >> > >> In any event, I don't care anymore - please just get this merged, to > >> AlexW's tree so I don't have conflicts with the rest of the ap changes > >> for VFIO I've got queued up. > > > > Christian, can you merge this with AlexW's tree? Halil suggested > > the 'fixes' and 'cc stable' tags ought to be removed, do I need > > to post another version or can you take those out when merging? > > Normally this would go via the KVM/s390 or s390 tree (as Alex did > not want to handle s390 vfio devices). > > Alex, as Jason is waiting for this to be in your tree could you take > this patch via your tree ?(please remove cc stable and Fixes for now > I want this to settle a bit). > > To carry this patch in your tree with my kvm/s390 and s390 maintainer hat > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> Is this intended for v5.14 or v5.15? I don't have a v5.15 next branch yet, so if this were to get into v5.14 before I create that, it'd be there for Jason as well. Posting a branch that we both merge into our linux-next branches would be another option. I can take it either way, just trying to understand what we're wanting to achieve. Thanks, Alex
