Re: [PATCH/RFC] KVM: selftests: introduce P44V64 for z196 and EC12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05.07.21 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:


On 05.07.21 11:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 01.07.21 17:38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Older machines likes z196 and zEC12 do only support 44 bits of physical
addresses. Make this the default and check via IBC if we are on a later
machine. We then add P47V64 as an additional model.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 1bc603af73dd ("KVM: selftests: introduce P47V64 for s390x")

[...]

+#ifdef __s390x__
+    {
+        int kvm_fd, vm_fd;
+        struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_processor info;
+
+        kvm_fd = open_kvm_dev_path_or_exit();
+        vm_fd = ioctl(kvm_fd, KVM_CREATE_VM, 0);
+        kvm_device_access(vm_fd, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL,
+                  KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR, &info, false);

Can we always assume to run on a kernel where this won't fail?

As far as I can tell, the selftests are bundled with a given kernel (and
there it should not fail). I guess most selftests will fail with a 3.x
kernel and we do not care?

Fair enough

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>


--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux