On 10/06/2021 16.19, Janosch Frank wrote:
To make our TAP parser (and me) happy we don't want to have two reports
with exactly the same wording so I added in two new prefix pushes.
Also moving the code inside of the region of a prefix will give us
more data when a problem arises.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
s390x/selftest.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/selftest.c b/s390x/selftest.c
index b2fe2e7b..0f099ca0 100644
--- a/s390x/selftest.c
+++ b/s390x/selftest.c
@@ -40,19 +40,28 @@ static void test_pgm_int(void)
static void test_malloc(void)
{
- int *tmp = malloc(sizeof(int));
- int *tmp2 = malloc(sizeof(int));
+ int *tmp, *tmp2;
+ report_prefix_push("malloc");
+
+ report_prefix_push("ptr_0");
+ tmp = malloc(sizeof(int));
+ report((uintptr_t)tmp & 0xf000000000000000ul, "allocated memory");
*tmp = 123456789;
+ mb();
+ report(*tmp == 123456789, "wrote allocated memory");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("ptr_1");
+ tmp2 = malloc(sizeof(int));
+ report((uintptr_t)tmp2 & 0xf000000000000000ul,
+ "allocated memory");
*tmp2 = 123456789;
mb();
+ report((*tmp2 == 123456789), "wrote allocated memory");
+ report_prefix_pop();
- report((uintptr_t)tmp & 0xf000000000000000ul, "malloc: got vaddr");
- report(*tmp == 123456789, "malloc: access works");
- report((uintptr_t)tmp2 & 0xf000000000000000ul,
- "malloc: got 2nd vaddr");
- report((*tmp2 == 123456789), "malloc: access works");
- report(tmp != tmp2, "malloc: addresses differ");
+ report(tmp != tmp2, "allocated memory addresses differ");
expect_pgm_int();
configure_dat(0);
@@ -62,6 +71,7 @@ static void test_malloc(void)
free(tmp);
free(tmp2);
+ report_prefix_pop();
}
int main(int argc, char**argv)
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
