On 6/17/21 8:23 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 16.06.21 16:16, Tony Krowiak wrote:
The function pointer to the interception handler for the PQAP
instruction
can get changed during the interception process. Let's add a
semaphore to struct kvm_s390_crypto to control read/write access to the
function pointer contained therein.
The semaphore must be locked for write access by the vfio_ap device
driver
when notified that the KVM pointer has been set or cleared. It must be
locked for read access by the interception framework when the PQAP
instruction is intercepted.
The locking looks so much nicer now. One (optional) thing.
Unfortunately, we aren't done yet.
Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 +++---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 6 +++---
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 8925f3969478..58edaa3f9602 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -803,14 +803,14 @@ struct kvm_s390_cpu_model {
unsigned short ibc;
};
-struct kvm_s390_module_hook {
+struct kvm_s390_crypto_hook {
int (*hook)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
- struct module *owner;
};
Can we actually get rid of the structure and use
int (*pqap_hook)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
Yes, we can.
struct kvm_s390_crypto {
struct kvm_s390_crypto_cb *crycb;
- struct kvm_s390_module_hook *pqap_hook;
+ struct rw_semaphore pqap_hook_rwsem;
+ struct kvm_s390_crypto_hook *pqap_hook;
here and below
Yes
__u32 crycbd;
__u8 aes_kw;
__u8 dea_kw;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 1296fc10f80c..418d910df569 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -2606,6 +2606,7 @@ static void kvm_s390_crypto_init(struct kvm *kvm)
{
kvm->arch.crypto.crycb = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->crycb;
kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(kvm);
+ init_rwsem(&kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
return;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index 9928f785c677..bbbd84ffe239 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -657,15 +657,15 @@ static int handle_pqap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* Verify that the hook callback is registered, lock the owner
* and call the hook.
*/
+ down_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook) {
- if (!try_module_get(vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook->owner))
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
ret = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook->hook(vcpu);
ret = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook(vcpu);
- module_put(vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook->owner);
if (!ret && vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[1] & 0x00ff0000)
kvm_s390_set_psw_cc(vcpu, 3);
+ up_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
return ret;
}
+ up_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
/*
* A vfio_driver must register a hook.
* No hook means no driver to enable the SIE CRYCB and no queues.
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 122c85c22469..d8abe5a11e49 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -353,7 +353,6 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_create(struct mdev_device
*mdev)
init_waitqueue_head(&matrix_mdev->wait_for_kvm);
mdev_set_drvdata(mdev, matrix_mdev);
matrix_mdev->pqap_hook.hook = handle_pqap;
- matrix_mdev->pqap_hook.owner = THIS_MODULE;
mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
list_add(&matrix_mdev->node, &matrix_dev->mdev_list);
mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
@@ -1115,15 +1114,20 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(struct
ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
}
kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
+ matrix_mdev->kvm = kvm;
matrix_mdev->kvm_busy = true;
mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+
+ down_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
+ kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = &matrix_mdev->pqap_hook;
+ up_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
+
kvm_arch_crypto_set_masks(kvm,
matrix_mdev->matrix.apm,
matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm,
matrix_mdev->matrix.adm);
+
mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
- kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = &matrix_mdev->pqap_hook;
- matrix_mdev->kvm = kvm;
matrix_mdev->kvm_busy = false;
wake_up_all(&matrix_mdev->wait_for_kvm);
}
@@ -1189,10 +1193,17 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(struct
ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
matrix_mdev->kvm_busy = true;
mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
- kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
+
+ if (matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd) {
+ down_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
+ matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
+ up_write(&matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
+
+ kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
+ }
+
mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev->mdev);
- matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm);
matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
matrix_mdev->kvm_busy = false;
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
index f82a6396acae..5d4fe6efbc73 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct ap_matrix_mdev {
bool kvm_busy;
wait_queue_head_t wait_for_kvm;
struct kvm *kvm;
- struct kvm_s390_module_hook pqap_hook;
and here?
Yep
+ struct kvm_s390_crypto_hook pqap_hook;
struct mdev_device *mdev;
};
