On 5/31/21 1:11 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2021 10:50:03 +0000
> Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> To make our TAP parser (and me) happy we don't want to have to reports
>
> "we want to have two reports" ?
>
> If that's not what has been intended, I'm confused :)
Things that happen if the following sentence is heard:
"Can you fix this quickly, please?"
Will fix, thanks for the review!
>
>> with exactly the same wording.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> s390x/selftest.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/s390x/selftest.c b/s390x/selftest.c
>> index b2fe2e7b..c2ca9896 100644
>> --- a/s390x/selftest.c
>> +++ b/s390x/selftest.c
>> @@ -47,12 +47,19 @@ static void test_malloc(void)
>> *tmp2 = 123456789;
>> mb();
>>
>> - report((uintptr_t)tmp & 0xf000000000000000ul, "malloc: got vaddr");
>> - report(*tmp == 123456789, "malloc: access works");
>> + report_prefix_push("malloc");
>> + report_prefix_push("ptr_0");
>> + report((uintptr_t)tmp & 0xf000000000000000ul, "allocated memory");
>> + report(*tmp == 123456789, "wrote allocated memory");
>> + report_prefix_pop();
>> +
>> + report_prefix_push("ptr_1");
>> report((uintptr_t)tmp2 & 0xf000000000000000ul,
>> - "malloc: got 2nd vaddr");
>> - report((*tmp2 == 123456789), "malloc: access works");
>> - report(tmp != tmp2, "malloc: addresses differ");
>> + "allocated memory");
>> + report((*tmp2 == 123456789), "wrote allocated memory");
>> + report_prefix_pop();
>> +
>> + report(tmp != tmp2, "allocated memory addresses differ");
>>
>> expect_pgm_int();
>> configure_dat(0);
>> @@ -62,6 +69,7 @@ static void test_malloc(void)
>>
>> free(tmp);
>> free(tmp2);
>> + report_prefix_pop();
>> }
>>
>> int main(int argc, char**argv)
>
