On 19/04/2021 13.45, Janosch Frank wrote:
On 4/19/21 1:24 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 16/03/2021 10.16, Janosch Frank wrote:
Let's also test sharing unavailable memory.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
s390x/uv-guest.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/s390x/uv-guest.c b/s390x/uv-guest.c
index 99544442..a13669ab 100644
--- a/s390x/uv-guest.c
+++ b/s390x/uv-guest.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <asm/interrupt.h>
#include <asm/facility.h>
#include <asm/uv.h>
+#include <sclp.h>
static unsigned long page;
@@ -99,6 +100,10 @@ static void test_sharing(void)
uvcb.header.len = sizeof(uvcb);
cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
report(cc == 0 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "share");
+ uvcb.paddr = get_ram_size() + PAGE_SIZE;
+ cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
+ report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x101, "invalid memory");
Would it make sense to add a #define for 0x101 ?
The RCs change meaning with each UV call so we can only re-use a small
number of constants which wouldn't gain us a lot.
Ok, fair point. A define just for one spot does not make too much sense, indeed.
Thomas