[PATCH 1/6] zfcp: remove unneeded INIT_LIST_HEAD() for FSF requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

INIT_LIST_HEAD() is only needed for actual list heads, while req->list
is used as a list entry.

Note that when the error path in zfcp_fsf_req_send() removes the request
from the adapter's list of pending requests, it actually looks up the
request from the zfcp_reqlist - rather than just calling list_del().
So there's no risk of us calling list_del() on a request that hasn't
been added to any list yet.

Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
index 485028324eae..2e4804ef2fb9 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
@@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ static struct zfcp_fsf_req *zfcp_fsf_req_create(struct zfcp_qdio *qdio,
 	if (adapter->req_no == 0)
 		adapter->req_no++;
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->list);
 	timer_setup(&req->timer, NULL, 0);
 	init_completion(&req->completion);
 
-- 
2.30.2




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux