Hi Claudio,
I'm working on making the page cache manage memory in larger chunks than
PAGE_SIZE [1] [2]. In doing so, I came across this call that you added:
@@ -2807,6 +2807,13 @@ int __test_set_page_writeback(struct page *page, bool keep_write)
inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
}
unlock_page_memcg(page);
+ access_ret = arch_make_page_accessible(page);
I'm going to change __test_set_page_writeback() to take a folio [3] and
now I'm wondering what interface you'd like to use. My preference would
be to rename arch_make_page_accessible() to arch_make_folio_accessible()
and pass a folio, at which time you would make the entire folio (however
many pages might be in it) accessible. If you would rather, we can
leave the interface as arch_make_page_accessible(), in which case we'll
just call it N times in __test_set_page_writeback() (and I won't need
to touch gup.c).
Let me know what you want.
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/849538/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210409185105.188284-1-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[3] https://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git/commitdiff/85297eb08f1b034b9652ea63dd053e3be4d7de7f
PS: The prototype is in gfp.h. That's not really appropriate; gfp.h
is about allocating memory, and this call really has nothing to do with
memory allocation. I think mm.h is a better place for it, if you can't
find a better header file than that.
