For both the patches,
Acked-by: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I will correct the description, and Heiko/Vasily will pick this up and
will be part of the s390-tree patchset.
On 3/29/21 11:40 AM, Shixin Liu wrote:
wait_queue_head_t can be initialized automatically with DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD()
rather than explicitly calling init_waitqueue_head().
A minor checkpatch WARNING. I will modify this.
Signed-off-by: Shixin Liu <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/cio/css.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
index f01ef6325039..a974943c27da 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
@@ -652,13 +652,12 @@ static void css_sch_todo(struct work_struct *work)
static struct idset *slow_subchannel_set;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(slow_subchannel_lock);
-static wait_queue_head_t css_eval_wq;
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(css_eval_wq);
static atomic_t css_eval_scheduled;
static int __init slow_subchannel_init(void)
{
atomic_set(&css_eval_scheduled, 0);
- init_waitqueue_head(&css_eval_wq);
slow_subchannel_set = idset_sch_new();
if (!slow_subchannel_set) {
CIO_MSG_EVENT(0, "could not allocate slow subchannel set\n");
