On 10:08 Mon 15 Feb 2021, Janosch Frank wrote:
On 2/13/21 4:32 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:s/oustanding/outstanding/Hey Bhaskar, while I do encourage anyone to send in changes I'm not a big fan of comment fixes if they are only a couple of characters and when the meaning is still intact despite the spelling mistake. You're creating more work for me than you had writing this patch and the improvement is close to zero. Be warned that I might not pick up such patches in the future. If you're ok with it I'll fix up the subject to this and pick up the patch: "kvm: s390: Fix comment spelling in kvm_s390_vcpu_start()"
Pls do.
Cheers, JanoschSigned-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx> --- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c index dbafd057ca6a..1d01afaca9fe 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c @@ -4545,7 +4545,7 @@ int kvm_s390_vcpu_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) /* * As we are starting a second VCPU, we have to disable * the IBS facility on all VCPUs to remove potentially - * oustanding ENABLE requests. + * outstanding ENABLE requests. */ __disable_ibs_on_all_vcpus(vcpu->kvm); } -- 2.30.1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
