Re: [RFC 1/1] s390/cio: Remove uevent-suppress from css driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/21/20 5:51 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:46:34 +0100
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 07:33:16 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I finally came around to test this. In my experience driverctl works for
subchannels and vfio_ccw without this patch, and continues to work with
it. I found the code in driverctl that does the unbind and the implicit
bind (via drivers_probe after after driver_override was set).

So now I have to ask, how exactly was the original problem diagnosed?

In https://marc.info/?l=linux-s390&m=158591045732735&w=2 there is a
paragraph like:

"""
So while there's definitely a good reason for wanting to delay uevents,
it is also introducing problems. One is udev rules for subchannels that
are supposed to do something before a driver binds (e.g. setting
driver_override to bind an I/O subchannel to vfio_ccw instead of
io_subchannel) are not effective, as the ADD uevent will only be
generated when the io_subchannel driver is already done with doing all
setup. Another one is that only the ADD uevent is generated after
uevent suppression is lifted; any other uevents that might have been
generated are lost.
"""

This is not how driverclt works! I.e. it deals with the situation that
the I/O subchannel was already bound to the io_subchannel driver at
the time the udev rule installed by driverctl activates (via the
mechanism I described above).

That's... weird. It definitely did not work on the LPAR I initially
tried it out on!


I think Boris told me some weeks ago that it didn't work for him either.
I will check with him after the winter sleep.

Yesterday I used driverctl successfully for a subchannel on F33.

Not sure what went wrong a couple of months ago but I cannot reproduce driverctl not working now.


However, I think removing the suppression still looks like a good idea:
we still have the "any uevent other than ADD will have been lost"
problem.

I totally agree with this.


I agree. I didn't look into the details, in general I think removing
quirks specific to 390 (when possible) is a good thing.

Regards,
Halil



--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards
   Boris Fiuczynski

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux