On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:47:58AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On 1/12/21 10:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> >> We use the UID of a zPCI adapter, or the UID of the function zero if
> >> there are multiple functions in an adapter, as PCI domain if and only if
> >> UID Checking is turned on.
> >> Otherwise we automatically generate domains as devices appear.
> >>
> >> The state of UID Checking is thus essential to know if the PCI domain
> >> will be stable, yet currently there is no way to access this information
> >> from userspace.
> >> So let's solve this by showing the state of UID checking as a sysfs
> >> attribute in /sys/bus/pci/uid_checking
> >> +/* Global zPCI attributes */
> >> +static ssize_t uid_checking_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> >> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >> +{
> >> + return sprintf(buf, "%i\n", zpci_unique_uid);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static struct kobj_attribute sys_zpci_uid_checking_attr =
> >> + __ATTR(uid_checking, 0444, uid_checking_show, NULL);
> >
> > Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO instead of __ATTR.
>
> It's my understanding that DEVICE_ATTR_* is only for
> per device attributes. This one is global for the entire
> Z PCI. I just tried with BUS_ATTR_RO instead
> and that works but only if I put the attribute at
> /sys/bus/pci/uid_checking instead of with a zpci
> subfolder. This path would work for us too, we
> currently don't have any other global attributes
> that we are planning to expose but those could of
> course come up in the future.
Ah, I missed the fact that this is a kobj_attribute, not a
device_attribute. Maybe KERNEL_ATTR_RO()? Very few uses so far, but
seems like it might fit?
Bjorn
