Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 9/9] s390x: sclp: Add CPU entry offset comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/01/2021 11.25, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 12.01.21 14:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
Let's make it clear that there is something at the end of the
struct. The exact offset is reported by the cpu_offset member.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/s390x/sclp.h | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
index dccbaa8..395895f 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -134,7 +134,10 @@ typedef struct ReadInfo {
  	uint8_t reserved7[134 - 128];
  	uint8_t byte_134_diag318 : 1;
  	uint8_t : 7;
-	struct CPUEntry entries[0];
+	/*
+	 * The cpu entries follow, they start at the offset specified
+	 * in offset_cpu.
+	 */

I mean, that's just best practice. At least when I spot "[0];" and the
end of a struct, I know what's happening.

No strong opinion about the comment, I wouldn't need it to understand it.

The problem is that the "CPUEntry" entries either might be at this location, or later, so the entries[0] can be misleading. You always have to go via the offset_cpu field to find the right location.

 Thomas




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux