On 12/16/20 11:05 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 16.12.20 10:58, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 16.12.20 02:21, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:10:20 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15.12.20 11:57, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:56:17 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The vfio_ap device driver registers a group notifier with VFIO when the
file descriptor for a VFIO mediated device for a KVM guest is opened to
receive notification that the KVM pointer is set (VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
event). When the KVM pointer is set, the vfio_ap driver takes the
following actions:
1. Stashes the KVM pointer in the vfio_ap_mdev struct that holds the state
of the mediated device.
2. Calls the kvm_get_kvm() function to increment its reference counter.
3. Sets the function pointer to the function that handles interception of
the instruction that enables/disables interrupt processing.
4. Sets the masks in the KVM guest's CRYCB to pass AP resources through to
the guest.
In order to avoid memory leaks, when the notifier is called to receive
notification that the KVM pointer has been set to NULL, the vfio_ap device
driver should reverse the actions taken when the KVM pointer was set.
Fixes: 258287c994de ("s390: vfio-ap: implement mediated device open callback")
Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index e0bde8518745..cd22e85588e1 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -1037,8 +1037,6 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
{
struct ap_matrix_mdev *m;
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
-
list_for_each_entry(m, &matrix_dev->mdev_list, node) {
if ((m != matrix_mdev) && (m->kvm == kvm)) {
mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
@@ -1049,7 +1047,6 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
matrix_mdev->kvm = kvm;
kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = &matrix_mdev->pqap_hook;
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -1083,35 +1080,49 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_iommu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static void "(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
+{
+ kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
+ matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
This patch LGTM. The only concern I have with it is whether a
different cpu is guaranteed to observe the above assignment as
an atomic operation. I think we didn't finish this discussion
at v1, or did we?
You mean just this assigment:
+ matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
should either have the old or the new value, but not halve zero halve old?
Yes that is the assignment I was referring to. Old value will work as well because
kvm holds a reference to this module while in the pqap_hook.
Normally this should be ok (and I would consider this a compiler bug if
this is split into 2 32 bit zeroes) But if you really want to be sure then we
can use WRITE_ONCE.
Just my curiosity: what would make this a bug? Is it the s390 elf ABI,
or some gcc feature, or even the C standard? Also how exactly would
WRITE_ONCE, also access via volatile help in this particular situation?
I think its a tricky things and not strictly guaranteed, but there is a lot
of code that relies on the atomicity of word sizes. see for example the discussion
here
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wgC4+kV9AiLokw7cPP429rKCU+vjA8cWAfyOjC3MtqC4A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
WRITE_ONCE will not change the guarantees a lot, but it is mostly a documentation
that we assume atomic access here.
After looking again at the code, I think I have to correct myself.
WRITE_ONCE does not look necessary.
Another thing, though:
Shouldnt we also replace this code
[...]
static void vfio_ap_mdev_release(struct mdev_device *mdev)
{
struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {
---> kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
---> matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
---> vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(mdev);
---> kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm);
---> matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
[...]
with vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm ?
I had that in the v2 patches, but mistakenly removed it
because of a misinterpretation of the docs on posting a
patch for a stable release. I'll restore it since I have to
remove the unlock from the vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm
function.
