On 12/9/20 10:19 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 09.12.20 10:12, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 08.12.20 16:09, Janosch Frank wrote: >>> In the past we had some issues when developers wanted to use code >>> snippets or constants from the kernel in a test or in the library. To >>> remedy that the s390x maintainers decided to move all files to GPL >>> 2 (if possible). >>> >>> At the same time let's move to SPDX identifiers as they are much nicer >>> to read. >>> >> >> If I am not wrong, your patch only replaces existing license text by >> SPDX identifiers. So I find this commit message rather confusing. The >> "at the same time" is actually the only thing that is being done - or am >> I missing something important? >> >> I wonder of we can just convert everything to GPL-2.0-or-later, the list >> of people that contributed to most files is rather limited, so getting >> most acks should be easy. >> > > Aehm, I missed the "Library" part :D If you look closely I remove the LGPL license blob and add a GPL2 SPDX identifier. One more reason to move to SPDX, the license blobs are hard to read as they are very similar until you come to the (L)GPL part. > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xE354E6B8E238B9F8.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
