On 25.11.20 09:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: >> So, I can think of several ways to fix this (or better: make this >> robust). However given that I will be away the next two weeks this is >> not going to happen for the upcoming merge window. I really don't want >> to rush this, since this has potential for severe subtle bugs... like >> we had them already several times with our address space and dynamic >> page table upgrade handling in the past (and like I nearly introduced >> at least one bug with this patch). >> >> Therefore the first three patches of this series are scheduled for the >> upcoming merge window, while the final set_fs() removal should come >> one merge later. > > Did you manage to get back to the s390 set_fs removal? > Heiko has queued the following: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features&id=87d5986345219a7e4f204726d9085ea87f3e22d0
